[yocto] Is the a reason for adding the + to SRCPV?

Burton, Ross ross.burton at intel.com
Tue Apr 10 05:44:30 PDT 2018


What tool is generating the code?  It probably shouldn't be using the
full path of the header...

Ross

On 10 April 2018 at 09:29, Måns Zigher <mans.zigher at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having some problems with one of my recipes when using the SRCPV the
> get_srcrev is returning "AUTOINC+" + rev. This will cause problem in my
> compile because I am using dbus codegen and it looks like the auto-generated
> code cannot handle the + sign in the paths. Is there a reason for this +
> sign. The generated code that causes my build to fail looks like this
>
> #ifndef
> ___HOME_EXTZIG_WORKSPACE_MOZART_MOZART_WORKSPACE_BUILDS_MOZART_RASPBERRYPI_BUILD_TMP_WORK_CORTEXA7HF_NEON_VFPV4_MOZART_LINUX_GNUEABI_MOZART_DAEMON_1_0_GITAUTOINC+8FD4C803AE_R3_GIT_SRC_LIBS_MOZART_BLE_SETUP_CODEGEN_ORG_BLUEZ_LE_ADVERTISEMENT_INTERFACE_H__
>
> Currently the only way for me to get the build to work is not use the SRCPV.
> Could it actually be a better way then using the + sign or is there a
> logical requirement for it?
>
> BR
> Mans Zigher
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>



More information about the yocto mailing list