[yocto] Is the a reason for adding the + to SRCPV?

Måns Zigher mans.zigher at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 02:12:26 PDT 2018


I believe dbus codegen is the tools generating the code.

Br
Mans Zigher

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, 14:44 Burton, Ross <ross.burton at intel.com> wrote:

> What tool is generating the code?  It probably shouldn't be using the
> full path of the header...
>
> Ross
>
> On 10 April 2018 at 09:29, Måns Zigher <mans.zigher at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am having some problems with one of my recipes when using the SRCPV the
> > get_srcrev is returning "AUTOINC+" + rev. This will cause problem in my
> > compile because I am using dbus codegen and it looks like the
> auto-generated
> > code cannot handle the + sign in the paths. Is there a reason for this +
> > sign. The generated code that causes my build to fail looks like this
> >
> > #ifndef
> >
> ___HOME_EXTZIG_WORKSPACE_MOZART_MOZART_WORKSPACE_BUILDS_MOZART_RASPBERRYPI_BUILD_TMP_WORK_CORTEXA7HF_NEON_VFPV4_MOZART_LINUX_GNUEABI_MOZART_DAEMON_1_0_GITAUTOINC+8FD4C803AE_R3_GIT_SRC_LIBS_MOZART_BLE_SETUP_CODEGEN_ORG_BLUEZ_LE_ADVERTISEMENT_INTERFACE_H__
> >
> > Currently the only way for me to get the build to work is not use the
> SRCPV.
> > Could it actually be a better way then using the + sign or is there a
> > logical requirement for it?
> >
> > BR
> > Mans Zigher
> >
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > yocto mailing list
> > yocto at yoctoproject.org
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20180411/a8cd85b7/attachment.html>


More information about the yocto mailing list