[yocto] yocto beagleboard.conf -- should it not go away?

Darren Hart dvhart at linux.intel.com
Tue Sep 4 16:23:20 PDT 2012



On 09/04/2012 01:25 PM, William Mills wrote:

> Darren: Is it true you can't get @ the Intel BSP's w/o also getting the 
> poky distro defs?  That does seem to mixing things a bit.  (I am not 
> claiming meta-ti is clean yet but I want to understand the Intel examples.)
> 

It isn't something we test as part of the QA that we perform. I mostly
expect people building meta-intel to be building with meta-yocto
(although I wouldn't take a hard line on requiring it). That said, I
removed meta-yocto from a meta-intel/meta-fri2 build and removed
DISTRO=poky from my local.conf and successfully built and booted a
core-image-minimal build on an FRI2 this afternoon without any changes.

This was with latest master of both poky and meta-intel. I have not
tried this with oe-core and bitbake pulled down separately, I'll leave
that as an exercise for the reader.

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel



More information about the yocto mailing list