[yocto] Is there anyway to get patched source tar file for gcc while building srpm?

Jegan Chandru pcjegan at gmail.com
Mon Jun 11 00:45:03 PDT 2012


<<bump>>
Added poky and oe-core.

anyone?

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Jegan Chandru <pcjegan at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Framework - poky-denzil-7.0
> arch - x86_64
>
> Is there anyway to get patched source tar file for gcc while building
> srpm? I have checked the srpms created and found gcc srpms has only the
> logs_with_scripts tar file and not the patched source. I have configured
> "archive-patched-source" in local.conf. Upon checking on archiver.bbclass,
> noticed "not_tarball" function is excluding work-shared dir.This dir is
> used by gcc only for building. I can see the obvious reason here
> that(correct me if I am wrong) since this source has been used by,
> say gcc-cross-intermediate, gcc-cross-4.6.3 and gcc-runtime-4.6.3 bb files
> and you dont want to archive that source. But anyone can tell me the exact
> reason on why work-shared is being omitted for archiving? Also, I must
> include that, there are total 40 patches for gcc and all patches getting
> applied in gcc-4.6.inc. So I think there is no harm in archiving that
> source.
>
> As a try and error, I have created a dummy function for not_tarball and
> tried to build, but that didnt work! ;(
>
> So please anyone shed some light on this matter. It is much appreciated.
> I need srpm with source for stabilizing and do some testing.
>
> Also there is a high chance that I missed something, so feel free to
> correct me. ;)
>
> Thanks,
> -JC
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20120611/a31ecfa4/attachment.html>


More information about the yocto mailing list