[yocto] nothing building under denzil-7.0.1

[Tom Zanussi]

On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 09:58 -0400, Jim Abernathy wrote:
> On 07/21/2012 12:06 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:55 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 15:39 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:35 -0400, Jim Abernathy wrote:
> >>>> On 07/20/2012 04:29 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
> >>>>> On 07/20/2012 01:11 PM, Jim Abernathy wrote:
> >>>>>> There must be some basic thing I'm missing.  Nothing that I used to
> >>>>>> build under denzil 7.0 will now build under denzil 7.0.1 or tracking the
> >>>>>> denzil branch.  Are all the BSPs required to be updated to 7.0.1 before
> >>>>>> you can run?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd thought I'd check before I post a bunch of log files.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I just downloaded the poky 7.0.1 tarball and cd'ed to that untarred
> >>>>>> directory and untarred the 7.0 Intel BSPs.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There must be a step I'm missing.  otherwise this would not have gotten
> >>>>>> thru testing before deployment.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Jim A
> >>>>> Hi Jim,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We need more specific information about the error(s) you're seeing.
> >>>>> We've done extensive QA with 7.0.1 and meta-intel, so I imagine there
> >>>>> must be a step you've forgotten.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For example, you are using the denzil branch of meta-intel, right?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Scott
> >>>>>
> >>>> I think it maybe that old problem with the n450 SRCREC being blank in
> >>>> the linux-yocto bbappend file.  Obviously that BSP didn't get fixed
> >>>> before 7.0.1 was deployed.  I'll put in the ones I used to patch in and
> >>>> see if it works.
> >>>>
> >>> I updated the n450 in both the denzil and master meta-intel branches,
> >>> but the tarball still needs to be updated with that fix.
> >>>
> >>> Is this the problem you're seeing, or are there other problems you're
> >>> seeing with this and/or the other meta-intel BSPs?
> >>>
> >> As a sanity check, I just now downloaded the denzil-7.0.1 tarball and
> >> the denzil sugarbay tarball and built successfully without any problems.
> >>
> > Also did a fresh clone of meta-intel, checked out meta-intel/denzil and
> > successfully built n450 with the denzil-7.0.1 tarball here with no
> > problems.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> I can confirm I had no issues doing just what you did. tarball for 
> denzil-7.0.1 and denzil clone for meta-intel and default core-image-sato 
> for n450.
> 
> Next, I cloned poky and checked out the tag denzil-7.0.1, which in 
> theory should match the tarball I ran with in the above test. I cloned 
> meta-intel and checked out the branch denzil, just as above.
> 
> So this good news is that worked as expected. The denzil-7.0.1 tag 
> equals the tarball.
> 
> So the only problem is the denzil branch of poky has some problem that's 
> seen in denzil-7.0.1 as it relates to n450.
> 

I'm not sure what you mean by this - I just did a build of poky/denzil
with meta-intel/denzil and again, didn't see any problems with that
permutation either.

Tom

> Jim A
> 
> 
> >> Tom
> >>
> >>
> >>> Tom
> >>>
> >>>> Jim A
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> yocto mailing list
> >>>> yocto at yoctoproject.org
> >>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> yocto mailing list
> >>> yocto at yoctoproject.org
> >>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> >
>