[yocto] nothing building under denzil-7.0.1

[Jim Abernathy]

On 07/21/2012 09:58 AM, Jim Abernathy wrote:
> On 07/21/2012 12:06 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:55 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 15:39 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:35 -0400, Jim Abernathy wrote:
>>>>> On 07/20/2012 04:29 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/20/2012 01:11 PM, Jim Abernathy wrote:
>>>>>>> There must be some basic thing I'm missing.  Nothing that I used to
>>>>>>> build under denzil 7.0 will now build under denzil 7.0.1 or 
>>>>>>> tracking the
>>>>>>> denzil branch.  Are all the BSPs required to be updated to 7.0.1 
>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>> you can run?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd thought I'd check before I post a bunch of log files.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just downloaded the poky 7.0.1 tarball and cd'ed to that untarred
>>>>>>> directory and untarred the 7.0 Intel BSPs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There must be a step I'm missing.  otherwise this would not have 
>>>>>>> gotten
>>>>>>> thru testing before deployment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jim A
>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We need more specific information about the error(s) you're seeing.
>>>>>> We've done extensive QA with 7.0.1 and meta-intel, so I imagine 
>>>>>> there
>>>>>> must be a step you've forgotten.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For example, you are using the denzil branch of meta-intel, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>
>>>>> I think it maybe that old problem with the n450 SRCREC being blank in
>>>>> the linux-yocto bbappend file.  Obviously that BSP didn't get fixed
>>>>> before 7.0.1 was deployed.  I'll put in the ones I used to patch 
>>>>> in and
>>>>> see if it works.
>>>>>
>>>> I updated the n450 in both the denzil and master meta-intel branches,
>>>> but the tarball still needs to be updated with that fix.
>>>>
>>>> Is this the problem you're seeing, or are there other problems you're
>>>> seeing with this and/or the other meta-intel BSPs?
>>>>
>>> As a sanity check, I just now downloaded the denzil-7.0.1 tarball and
>>> the denzil sugarbay tarball and built successfully without any 
>>> problems.
>>>
>> Also did a fresh clone of meta-intel, checked out meta-intel/denzil and
>> successfully built n450 with the denzil-7.0.1 tarball here with no
>> problems.
>>
>> Tom
>>
> I can confirm I had no issues doing just what you did. tarball for 
> denzil-7.0.1 and denzil clone for meta-intel and default 
> core-image-sato for n450.
>
> Next, I cloned poky and checked out the tag denzil-7.0.1, which in 
> theory should match the tarball I ran with in the above test. I cloned 
> meta-intel and checked out the branch denzil, just as above.
>
> So this good news is that worked as expected. The denzil-7.0.1 tag 
> equals the tarball.
>
> So the only problem is the denzil branch of poky has some problem 
> that's seen in denzil-7.0.1 as it relates to n450.
>
> Jim A
>
>
FYI,  I added the meta-baryon layer after I got the n450 straightened 
out.  It's fine as well.

Jim A

>>> Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>>> Jim A
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> yocto mailing list
>>>>> yocto at yoctoproject.org
>>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> yocto mailing list
>>>> yocto at yoctoproject.org
>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>>
>