[yocto] [beagleboard] Yocto

[Xianghua Xiao]

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Petr Štetiar <ynezz at true.cz> wrote:
> Michael J. Hammel <mjhammel at graphics-muse.org> [2010-12-03 11:01:27]:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I've heard of Yocto only in passing.  I'm assuming it's another
>> bitbake-based metabuild system?  Is there some reasoning why
>> Meego/Linaro/OpenEmbedded/Angstrom/Custom Builds cannot fill the
>> requirements of Yocto?  I don't mean that harshly at all - I'm just
>> curious about the evolution and true target audiences of these projects.
>> It's nice to have choices, but developers should have some idea of the
>> differences so they can choose wisely when just starting.
>
> Richard wrote nice summary[1], it's worth reading and it might answer your
> questions as well :-)
>
> 1. http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-November/026598.html
>
> -- ynezz
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beagle Board" group.
> To post to this group, send email to beagleboard at googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to beagleboard+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard?hl=en.
>
>

May we know roughly how many paid resources are behind Yocto?

Which arch will be first officially supported? Will it be ATOM as Poky
is really part of Intel? Beagle/ARM will be done by the community
instead?

Thanks,
Xianghua