[meta-freescale] is meta-fsl-ppc layer even used anymore?

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Otavio Salvador wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >   i was having trouble building for t1042d4rdb with the
> >> > meta-fsl-ppc layer until i noticed that the meta-freescale layer
> >> > had a machine definition for the same target. does the
> >> > meta-freescale layer obsolete meta-fsl-ppc?
> >>
> >> Yes. meta-freescale provides it all.
> >
> >   then it might be useful to remove links to superseded meta-fsl-*
> > layers from
> > https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/
>
> For meta-fsl-arm I added, long time ago, a note:
>
> For morty and newer releases, use the meta-freescale layer instead.
>
> Now to be even more clear, I setted it to inactive.

  excellent.

> The meta-fsl-ppc, I don't have control on the metadata to update it.
> I am adding Luo to look at it.

  so does that mean meta-fsl-ppc has also been folded into
meta-freescale? or is it still meant to be used independently?

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================