[meta-freescale] is meta-fsl-ppc layer even used anymore?

[Otavio Salvador]

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >   i was having trouble building for t1042d4rdb with the
>> >> > meta-fsl-ppc layer until i noticed that the meta-freescale layer
>> >> > had a machine definition for the same target. does the
>> >> > meta-freescale layer obsolete meta-fsl-ppc?
>> >>
>> >> Yes. meta-freescale provides it all.
>> >
>> >   then it might be useful to remove links to superseded meta-fsl-*
>> > layers from
>> > https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/
>>
>> For meta-fsl-arm I added, long time ago, a note:
>>
>> For morty and newer releases, use the meta-freescale layer instead.
>>
>> Now to be even more clear, I setted it to inactive.
>
>   excellent.
>
>> The meta-fsl-ppc, I don't have control on the metadata to update it.
>> I am adding Luo to look at it.
>
>   so does that mean meta-fsl-ppc has also been folded into
> meta-freescale? or is it still meant to be used independently?

folded.


-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750