[yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.8_M3.rc1)

[Jain, Sangeeta]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>
>Sent: Monday, 23 September, 2019 3:46 PM
>To: Jain, Sangeeta <sangeeta.jain at intel.com>; yocto at yoctoproject.org;
>Tummalapalli, Vineela <vineela.tummalapalli at intel.com>
>Cc: otavio at ossystems.com.br; yi.zhao at windriver.com; Sangal, Apoorv
><apoorv.sangal at intel.com>; Yeoh, Ee Peng <ee.peng.yeoh at intel.com>; Chan,
>Aaron Chun Yew <aaron.chun.yew.chan at intel.com>; Ang, Chin Huat
><chin.huat.ang at intel.com>; akuster808 at gmail.com; sjolley.yp.pm at gmail.com
>Subject: Re: QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.8_M3.rc1)
>
>On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 07:37 +0000, Jain, Sangeeta wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> LSB support was expected to be removed from build 'yocto-2.8_M3.rc1'
>> onwards, but link on AB still points to LSB images.
>> The images present inside
>> https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-
>2.8_M3.rc1/machines/genericx86-64-lsb/
>>   are built with systemd as init manager.
>>
>> Can you please confirm if these are altcfg images and the link name
>> needs to updated?
>
>Well spotted!
>
>I can confirm these are altcfg images which have systemd as the init manager.
>
>For backwards compatibility the autobuilder target names didn't change but the
>configuration they're built with did. I hadn't realised this would be visible in the
>release so we may need to think about that for
>M4 but they are altcfg images.
>

Thanks for confirmation. We will include them in test coverage.
>[Added Vineela to cc:]
>
>Cheers,
>
>Richard

Thanks,
Sangeeta