[yocto] QA cycle report for 2.6 M4 RC1

akuster808 akuster808 at gmail.com
Sat Nov 10 10:02:50 PST 2018


On 11/10/18 8:25 AM, richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 09:24 +0000, Jain, Sangeeta wrote:
>> This is the full report for 2.6 M4 RC1: 
>> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/WW44_-_2018-10-30_-_Full_Test_Cycle_2.6_M4_RC1
> Thanks Sangeeta and team!
>
> Now we have the QA report for YP 2.6 M4 rc1 (Final 2.6) we need to make
> a release go or nogo decision. To do this we have the following:
>  
> QA Report: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/WW44_-_2018-10-30_-_Full_Test_Cycle_2.6_M4_RC1
> Release Criteria: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v2.6_Status#Milestone_4.2FFinal_-_Target_Oct._26.2C_2018
>
> We'd be happy to take representations from members and the community to
> help reach that decision.

Regarding.

*Bug 12991* <https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12991>
-[2.6 M4 RC1][Build-Appliance] Bitbake build-appliance-image getting
failed during building image due to webkitgtk package

Does it mean the Build-Appliance is non functioning ?  It was broken at
the Sumo release time as well. Should it be dropped as the release criteria?

- Armin

> My personal view is that whilst there are a number of issues present in
> rc1, we should release it, collect up fixes on the thud branch (aleady
> happening) and plan on a 2.6.1 as soon as it looks like we have enough
> critical mass behind those as opposed to an rc2 and further delays to
> the release.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20181110/48615844/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the yocto mailing list