[yocto] should layers define BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY ?= "1"?
Paul Eggleton
paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
Mon Nov 2 10:01:45 PST 2015
Hi Robert,
On Monday 02 November 2015 12:54:33 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> perusing the meta-musl layer, and noticed in layer.conf the line:
>
> BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY ?= "1"
>
> i thought this was a bit odd since (at least to me) it seems like the
> sort of thing a *developer* might set in their local.conf to
> temporarily deal with a dangling .bbappend file -- it never occurred
> to me that it would be appropriate for a layer to define that value
> itself as an inherent part of its own ... layerness.
>
> a quick grep of the couple dozen layers i have checked out revealed
> two layers that do that:
>
> ./meta-musl/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY ?= "1"
> ./meta-yocto-kernel-extras/meta-kernel-dev/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPEND
> S_WARNONLY ?= "true"
>
> i'm curious what others think of this approach.
I'd say no, they shouldn't really. As a user of the layer you might not
realise that it's making this change to your configuration.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the yocto
mailing list