[yocto] in kernel manual, should pick another example for KMACHINE

[Rifenbark, Scott M]

So I was digging in the meta-xilinx layer and down in recipes-kernel/linux/linux-zynqmp-mainline_3.19.bb there are two KMACHINE lines:

  KMACHINE_ep108-zynqmp ?= "zynqmp"
  KMACHINE_qemuzynqmp ?= "zynqmp"

Given these two lines, this is a good example that shows two machines mapping to the same KMACHINE value?

Scott

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert P. J. Day [mailto:rpjday at crashcourse.ca]
>Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 9:15 AM
>To: Rifenbark, Scott M
>Cc: Nathan Rossi; Yocto discussion list
>Subject: RE: [yocto] in kernel manual, should pick another example for
>KMACHINE
>
>On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
>
>> I like Nathan's suggestion for the text.  Can someone explain to me
>> though why emenlow is not a good example here?  In the
>> linux-yocto_3.14.bbappend file, KMACHINE_emenlow-noemgd is set equal
>> to "emenlow".  Isn't this equating emenlow-noemgd and emenlow?  I am
>> probably mis-understanding it so I could use some further explanation.
>
>  normally, yes, but there *is* only the emenlow-noemgd machine, there is
>no longer an emenlow machine. AIUI, there *used* to be both machines,
>both using the same KMACHINE value, and that would have been a perfect
>example.
>
>  personally, i think it would be more informative if you had two or more actual
>machines mapping to the same KMACHINE value, but that's just me.
>
>rday
>
>--
>
>===========================================================
>=============
>Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
>                        http://crashcourse.ca
>
>Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
>LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
>===========================================================
>=============