[yocto] [meta-oracle-java][PATCH] Add support for Java SE Embedded

Maxin B. John maxin.john at enea.com
Mon Sep 8 04:08:58 PDT 2014


Hi Vladimir,

In that case, let's go ahead with "oracle-jse-ejre.inc" rather than removing
the "LICENSE" file from oracle-jse.inc.

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:49:18AM +0000, Vladimir Redzhepov wrote:
> Hi Maxin,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Maxin B. John [mailto:maxin.john at enea.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 11:16 AM
> > To: Vladimir Redzhepov
> > Cc: yocto at yoctoproject.org; Pavel Shumeika
> > Subject: Re: [meta-oracle-java][PATCH] Add support for Java SE Embedded
> > 
> > Hi Vladimir,
> > 
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 03:58:53PM +0000, Vladimir Redzhepov wrote:
> > > >From 783ff400987ec06f41286ffce7e3afc4545d67e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > 2001
> > > From: Vladimir Redzhepov <vladimir_redzhepov at epam.com>
> > > Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:13:42 +0300
> > > Subject: [PATCH] Add support for Java SE Embedded
> > >
> > > LICENSE file removed from LIC_FILES_CHKSUM in oracle-jse.inc
> > > because it doesn't exist in ejre.
> > 
> > Can we avoid removing the LICENSE file from oracle-jse.inc ?
> Removing the LICENSE could be avoided by overriding LIC_FILES_CHKSUM in
> oracle-jse-ejre.inc like this
> 
> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "\
> 	file://${WORKDIR}/${JDK_JRE}${PV}_${PV_UPDATE}/COPYRIGHT;md5=be9fe5d47a7dcfb78f142f487afb34bb \
> 	file://${WORKDIR}/${JDK_JRE}${PV}_${PV_UPDATE}/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.txt;md5=f3a388961d24b8b72d412a079a878cdb \
> 	"
> In my mind it's better to keep and update all checksums in one place such oracle-jse.inc which is common for all recipes.

Best Regards,
Maxin



More information about the yocto mailing list