[yocto] 9.0.1 release tarball requires bitbake 1.19.1 but provides 1.18.0?

[Paul Eggleton]

On Friday 19 July 2013 07:52:03 Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:07 AM, r10kindsofpeople
> <r10kindsofpeople at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've run into another issue when trying to upgrade my system from Denzil
> > to Dylan using the released packages.  I extracted the 9.0.1 released
> > tarball, added the crownbay BSP, then moved my layers over from Denzil. 
> > Sourced the build directory, then modified bblayers.conf and local.conf to
> > merge my specifics with the new formats.
> > 
> > 'bitbake core-image-minimal' results in an error... "OE-core's config
> > sanity checker detected a potential misconfiguration." and "Bitbake
> > version 1.19.1 is required and version 1.18.0 was found".
> > 
> > A contributing factor may be that I also have a git snapshot from 2 days
> > ago on the same system (that builds), but I've tried to keep them in
> > separate directories and be careful about running the source script in
> > it's own shell.
> > 
> > Is this a problem with the release tarball or a PICNIC problem?
> 
> It shouldn't be a problem with the tarball as the download tarball is
> 
> http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-1.4.1/poky-73f103bf9b
> 2cdf985464dc53bf4f1cfd71d4531f.tar.bz2
> 
> which corresponds with the tagged release at:
> 
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?h=dylan&id=73f103bf9b
> 2cdf985464dc53bf4f1cfd71d4531f
> 
> I just validated the tarball and can't reproduce so my guess is that
> this is probably a dirty env issue.

It does sound that way. John, you haven't perhaps changed the path to the 
metadata but re-used the build directory, such that BBLAYERS in bblayers.conf 
still points to the development snapshot?

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre