[yocto] [pull-sys940x 2/4] ranpwd: Add ranpwd recipe

[Martin Jansa]

On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:59:36PM -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
> On 06/02/12 08:17, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 February 2012 13:11:19 Joshua Lock wrote:
> >> Apologies. I'm wrong here. It was PRIORITY which we agreed to drop.
> >
> > It's worth noting however, at the same time PRIORITY removal was discussed it
> > was acknowledged that SECTION was questionable. Logical grouping of
> > recipes/packages is a useful thing but coming up with groupings that are
> > meaningful in all contexts is hard :(
> 
> Glad to know my recollection isn't wildly off the mark.
> 
> I noticed that there are similar, yet different, SECTION values being 
> used. If we opt to keep SECTION I wonder if we should try and 
> standardise/sanitise it?

If there is standardised SECTION variable why not use
recipes-${SECTION}/foo_1.0.bb as we already have couple of recipe-*
directories and it's sometimes hard to decide to which directory
something belongs.

Or other way around, standartise recipes-* directories and let bitbake
decide SECTION from it (like it does for PV and PN).

Cheers,

> 
> Debian's sections seem like reasonable inspiration? 
> http://packages.debian.org/stable/
> 
> I think SECTION is useful for tools like Hob and Narcissus, so I'm in 
> favour of keeping them.
> 
> Cheers,
> Joshua
> -- 
> Joshua Lock
>          Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
>          Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20120207/b87a8ab9/attachment.pgp>