[yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

[Darren Hart]

On 04/03/2012 10:34 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Chris Larson <clarson at kergoth.com> wrote:
>> I really don't see what the issue is here. If you want a stable
>> branch, we can look into creating such a thing upstream, though I'm
>> personally of the opinion that master should remain release-quality,
>> and make better use of feature branches, potentially a
>> next/integration branch for forthcoming features, than trying to
>> cherry pick onto a "stable" branch. There's nothing poky's structure
>> provides that can't also be provided via branching policy in the
>> individual repositories.
> 
> I like what Chris said.  I vote for this.  It is standard SCM
> practice.  All development goes on in a branch.  Integration on
> another branch.  When good enough, it is merged to master and tagged
> as a milestone release.

I'd really like to see this as well.

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel