[yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

[Brian Hutchinson]

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Chris Larson <clarson at kergoth.com> wrote:
> I really don't see what the issue is here. If you want a stable
> branch, we can look into creating such a thing upstream, though I'm
> personally of the opinion that master should remain release-quality,
> and make better use of feature branches, potentially a
> next/integration branch for forthcoming features, than trying to
> cherry pick onto a "stable" branch. There's nothing poky's structure
> provides that can't also be provided via branching policy in the
> individual repositories.

I like what Chris said.  I vote for this.  It is standard SCM
practice.  All development goes on in a branch.  Integration on
another branch.  When good enough, it is merged to master and tagged
as a milestone release.

Regards,

Brian