[yocto] docs: how to spell "bitbake", and docbook semantic markup for user input

[Rifenbark, Scott M]

Robert, 

I know that and will work towards that end as well. There are a lot of holdover things in our docs.

Thanks, 
Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert P. J. Day [mailto:rpjday at crashcourse.ca] 
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 7:29 AM
To: Rifenbark, Scott M
Cc: Richard Purdie; Darren Hart; yocto at yoctoproject.org
Subject: RE: [yocto] docs: how to spell "bitbake", and docbook semantic markup for user input

On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:

> Agreed that BitBake is the correct spelling.  I will be sure to make
> a sweep through our Yocto manuals and make sure that when we are
> referring to the tool and not indicating the command they say
> "BitBake".

  and while you're at it, i was once lectured sternly that the proper
spelling is "Git" when talking about the tool and "git" when referring
to the actual command.  never "GIT".  at least that what i was told.
do with that what you wish.

rday

p.s.  since i am, at this very moment, immersed in an XML publishing
toolchain, i will probably have some thoughts on docbook markup in the
near future.  stay tuned ...