[yocto] Variable locality too restricted.

Koen Kooi koen at dominion.thruhere.net
Wed Dec 7 06:14:28 PST 2011


Op 7 dec. 2011, om 15:10 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:

> On Wednesday 07 December 2011 15:07:54 Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> Changing MACHINE has other implications though; do we not have any other
>>> way to switch out the kernel on a per-image basis?
>> 
>> And how would that work from a packaging perspective? AIUI changing
>> DISTRO/MACHINE flags in an image is a recipe for failure.
> 
> I'm not suggesting changing the kernel configuration for the existing kernel; 
> naturally you would need a different kernel recipe. Surely you should just be 
> able to have a different kernel that is built and installed for a different 
> image file? No invalidated packages necessary.

A kernel buld will generate packages and thanks to kernel.bbclass they will have similar names. So what will happen when I do:

bitbake foo-image bar-image

? Will it build 2 kernels? Which kernel will end up being packaged or will there be a mix of both in deploy?

regards,

Koen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20111207/a5ab927c/attachment.pgp>


More information about the yocto mailing list