[yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE meta-ti BSP layer YP Compatible

[akuster]

So what now? Is the voting on hold?

-armin


On 03/05/2018 11:50 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:25:20PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:12 PM, akuster <akuster at mvista.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/05/2018 10:48 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> FWIW, just tried with distroless setup - only oe-core and meta-ti and still
>>> get a PASS.
>>>
>>> Did you test with qemuarm?
>>>
>>>
>>> The current explanation in the dev-manual does not make that a requirement
>>> for the Yocto-check-layer to be run. If it is unclear, then we need to
>>> update doc's or clarify things in the docs.
>>>
>>>  If the script is mis-behaving, then please open a bug.
>> A BSP layer cannot change other machines, so it implies that a non-BSP
>> machine must be tested against.
> So, this eudev.bbappend, you are so adamant about, adds couple files to 
> SRC_URI, which are not patches, just extra rule files, so the source doesn't 
> change. They are also not installed by default, they are only installed on TI 
> machines...
>
> Ok, running bitbake-diffsigs manually to emulate your error condition, I get 
> this signature difference. Now, changing SRC_URI to only add those 2 files 
> for TI machines, so for anything else it would pretty much result in an empty 
> bbappend. And guess what? It still reports the same signature difference!
>