[yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: raw metrics

[Nicolas Dechesne]

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:47 AM, akuster <akuster at mvista.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 11/07/2017 01:59 PM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote:
>
> Hi Nico – thanks for this, I have been meaning to get back to it.
>
>
>
> Unless there is a reason to keep the conversation wide, let’s start a
> separate thread with interested parties. Let me know if you’d like to be
> part of the metrics conversation.
>
> Please include me in the new thread.
>

me too. please.


>
> - armin
>
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> Jeffrey “Jefro” Osier-Mixon, Intel Corporation
>
> Open Source Community Manager
>
>
>
> *From:* yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-ab-bounces@
> yoctoproject.org <yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org>] * On Behalf Of *Nicolas
> Dechesne
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 24, 2017 12:37 AM
> *To:* Jeff Osier-Mixon <jefro at jefro.net> <jefro at jefro.net>
> *Cc:* yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> *Subject:* Re: [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: raw metrics
>
>
>
> hi Jeff,
>
> thanks for showing this and sharing the link.
>
>
>
> If we take a look at the top repo, we see
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> Commits are counted once (of course), and since several of these trees are
> 'combined' together, most commits end up (wrongly?) in poky-contrib. We
> probably want to show that in a different way. I can guess that the trees
> are processed in a specific 'order' and that each commit is attributed to a
> repo when it is first met. So that means that the ordered list we provide
> is important, and we need to decide how we want to look at the data.
>
>
>
> There are 2 possible orders (for the main repo):
>
> 1. poky
>
> 2. bitbake
>
> 3. oe-core
>
> 4. meta-yocto
>
> 5. *-contrib
>
>
>
> or
>
>
>
> 1. oe-core
>
> 2. bitbake
>
> 3. meta-yocto
>
> 4. poky
>
> 5. *-contrib
>
>
>
> Both options should give different views. Based on the structure of our
> development process, I suppose that the 2nd one makes more sense.
>
>
>
> Some additional questions:
>
>
>
> * Can we choose which branches in repo are processed? At the very least
> -next branches should not be taken into account.
>
> * Should we try to track only 'release' branches as much as possible
>
> * Isn't poky-buildhistory irrelevant here? I think we should remove it
>
> * Should we keep the -contrib trees?
>
> * can you share the whole list of repo that are being used?
>
>
>
> cheers
>
> nico
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Jeff Osier-Mixon <jefro at jefro.net> wrote:
>
> These are the metrics links we discussed yesterday. Think of these as
> building blocks to provide data. Now we need to figure out good questions
> to ask to determine how to measure the health of the community. This will
> be an ongoing effort over the next quarter.
>
>
>
> Bitergia is a company that LF has contracted with to provide metrics for
> all of their collaborative projects. Intel paid for additional data sets
> and support on behalf of the Yocto Project. Through these tools we have
> visualized data for the git repos, mailing lists, and bugzilla instance.
> These visualizations are highly configurable, and the whole setup is built
> with open source software.
>
>
>
> https://yoctoproject.biterg.io
>
>
>
> OpenHub is a BlackDuck project that provides a medium-depth dive into the
> git server.
>
>
>
> https://www.openhub.net/p/YoctoProject
>
>
> Now that we have these tools, I look forward to working with those
> interested on customizing the data set definitions so we know exactly what
> we are looking at.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Jeff Osier-Mixon - Open Source Community Manager, Intel Corporation
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> yocto-ab mailing list
> yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto-ab
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto-ab/attachments/20171108/74b65542/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 18740 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto-ab/attachments/20171108/74b65542/attachment-0001.png>