[yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: raw metrics

[akuster]

On 11/07/2017 01:59 PM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote:
>
> Hi Nico – thanks for this, I have been meaning to get back to it.
>
>  
>
> Unless there is a reason to keep the conversation wide, let’s start a
> separate thread with interested parties. Let me know if you’d like to
> be part of the metrics conversation.
>
Please include me in the new thread.

- armin

>  
>
> thanks
>
>  
>
> Jeffrey “Jefro” Osier-Mixon, Intel Corporation
>
> Open Source Community Manager
>
>  
>
> *From:*yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org
> [mailto:yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Nicolas Dechesne
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 24, 2017 12:37 AM
> *To:* Jeff Osier-Mixon <jefro at jefro.net>
> *Cc:* yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> *Subject:* Re: [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: raw metrics
>
>  
>
> hi Jeff,
>
> thanks for showing this and sharing the link. 
>
>  
>
> If we take a look at the top repo, we see
>
> Inline image 1
>
> Commits are counted once (of course), and since several of these trees
> are 'combined' together, most commits end up (wrongly?) in
> poky-contrib. We probably want to show that in a different way. I can
> guess that the trees are processed in a specific 'order' and that each
> commit is attributed to a repo when it is first met. So that means
> that the ordered list we provide is important, and we need to decide
> how we want to look at the data. 
>
>  
>
> There are 2 possible orders (for the main repo):
>
> 1. poky
>
> 2. bitbake
>
> 3. oe-core
>
> 4. meta-yocto
>
> 5. *-contrib
>
>  
>
> or 
>
>  
>
> 1. oe-core
>
> 2. bitbake 
>
> 3. meta-yocto
>
> 4. poky
>
> 5. *-contrib
>
>  
>
> Both options should give different views. Based on the structure of
> our development process, I suppose that the 2nd one makes more sense. 
>
>  
>
> Some additional questions:
>
>  
>
> * Can we choose which branches in repo are processed? At the very
> least -next branches should not be taken into account.
>
> * Should we try to track only 'release' branches as much as possible
>
> * Isn't poky-buildhistory irrelevant here? I think we should remove it
>
> * Should we keep the -contrib trees?
>
> * can you share the whole list of repo that are being used? 
>
>  
>
> cheers
>
> nico
>
>  
>
>  
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Jeff Osier-Mixon <jefro at jefro.net
> <mailto:jefro at jefro.net>> wrote:
>
>     These are the metrics links we discussed yesterday. Think of these
>     as building blocks to provide data. Now we need to figure out good
>     questions to ask to determine how to measure the health of the
>     community. This will be an ongoing effort over the next quarter.
>
>      
>
>     Bitergia is a company that LF has contracted with to provide
>     metrics for all of their collaborative projects. Intel paid for
>     additional data sets and support on behalf of the Yocto Project.
>     Through these tools we have visualized data for the git repos,
>     mailing lists, and bugzilla instance. These visualizations are
>     highly configurable, and the whole setup is built with open source
>     software.
>
>      
>
>     https://yoctoproject.biterg.io
>
>      
>
>     OpenHub is a BlackDuck project that provides a medium-depth dive
>     into the git server. 
>
>      
>
>     https://www.openhub.net/p/YoctoProject
>
>
>     Now that we have these tools, I look forward to working with those
>     interested on customizing the data set definitions so we know
>     exactly what we are looking at.
>
>      
>
>     -- 
>
>     Jeff Osier-Mixon - Open Source Community Manager, Intel Corporation
>
>
>     --
>     _______________________________________________
>     yocto-ab mailing list
>     yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org>
>     https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto-ab
>
>  
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto-ab/attachments/20171107/1584cbc3/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 18740 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto-ab/attachments/20171107/1584cbc3/attachment-0001.png>