[yocto-ab] YP Participant: Silica

[Osier-mixon, Jeffrey]

Their statement is that they want to unify their SDKs using YP. I took
that to mean that they would use vendor BSPs to create their SDKs
where possible, and develop BSPs when needed. I don't know the
specifics, but it might be a good question to ask them. Maybe I can
get them to give us a little presentation.

On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> Jeff
>
> Looks good to me and vote is  Yes. I have a question along with.
> They have so much stuff listed under tools and software, are they
> going to create their own SDKs for some/all of them
> or supply the yocto based SDKs from other vendors, how do they use
> Yocto project ?
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey
> <jeffrey.osier-mixon at intel.com> wrote:
>> Silica is a producer of small boards, working with YP member orgs TI,
>> Feescale, and Renesas. They want to provide a common SDK based on YP,
>> and they have already started doing so with their Pengwyn board
>> (http://www.silica.com/product/silica-pengwyn-board.html). This is
>> very much the kind of organization we try to foster with this program.
>>
>> Please vote yes/no on Silica as YP Participant. If you have any
>> concerns, let's discuss them at the AB meeting on Weds, but let me
>> know ahead of time so I can research any needed information before the
>> meeting.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Osier-Mixon http://jefro.net/blog
>> Yocto Project Community Manager @Intel http://yoctoproject.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> yocto-ab mailing list
>> yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto-ab



-- 
Jeff Osier-Mixon http://jefro.net/blog
Yocto Project Community Manager @Intel http://yoctoproject.org