[meta-ti] xf86-video-omap and libdrm for OMAP

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:10:17PM +0100, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> well.. obviously, with the libdrm update, and our .bbappend in meta-ti
> things are even worse than I had thought... and the tree doesn't even build
> anymore, at least for panda, as we have:
> 
> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "omap4|omap5"
> 
> in the .bbappend
> 
> so now that brings another question... should we start a 'danny' branch on
> meta-ti? if we remove the libdrm and xf86-video-omap recipes from
> meta-ti/master, then we break meta-ti/master with poky/danny...

Yes, creating danny branch was on my list - was waiting for any specific 
requirements like this one... :)

-- 
Denys


> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Nicolas Dechesne <ndec13 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > hi
> >
> > i just noticed that the recipe for xf86-video-omap was just merged into
> > poky/master, and that libdrm was updated as well (and OMAP experimental
> > support was enabled too):
> >
> > 0ed7c53 xf86-video-omap: add new recipe to follow the maintained repo
> > cb758f9 libdrm: upgrade to 2.4.40
> >
> > from a quick review, i believe this should supersede the recipes from
> > meta-ti that got merged recently:
> >
> > 410dc02 xf86-video-omap: add new recipe for OMAP4/5 X11 video driver
> > cce5a7a libdrm: enable omap experimental api support
> >
> > i won't be able to get that tested in the next couple of days, very
> > likely, so i wanted to know:
> >
> > - if anyone tested poky/master (or oe-core as this came from oe-core) on
> > panda and/or beagle?
> > - what is the policy in this situation? should we simply remove our
> > recipes from meta-ti?
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > nicolas
> >
> >
> >
> >

> _______________________________________________
> meta-ti mailing list
> meta-ti at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti