[meta-intel] [meta-isg][fido][master][PATCH]dpdk:fix incorrect config fix-up patch and also tidy up dpdk.inc

[Darren Hart]

On 7/27/15 4:14 AM, chia.chuan.wu at intel.com wrote:
> From: WU CHIA CHUAN <chia.chuan.wu at intel.com>
> 
> Hi Darren,
> 

Hi Chia Chuan,

Please use my email ID present in the git history and MAINTAINERS:
dvhart at linux.intel.com


> This patch fixed the critcal issue in build configuration variables that were not correctly parsed by to
> do_configure() task. The environment variables introduced by below patches, $(DPDK_TARGET_MACH) & $(CONFIG_VHOST_ENABLED)
> are not evaluated because the config files under dpdk/config/ folder are not parsed by Makefile but instead by cpp compiler.
> 
> 	 dpdk/dpdk-1.8.0-and-2.0.0-dpdk-defconfig-select-RTE_MACHINE-type.patch
> 	 dpdk/dpdk-1.8.0-dpdk-enable-build-config-VHOST-in-common_linuxapp-config.patch
> 	 dpdk/dpdk-2.0.0-dpdk-enable-VHOST-and-ip_fragmentation-in-common_linuxapp.patch
> 
> This patch also tidy up dpdk.inc by integrating common recipe from dpdk_1.8.0.bb and dpdk_2.0.0.bb.
> Kindly review and if the patch are acceptable ,please help to merge them into fido and master branch.

It took me a bit to realize this is not a patch, but a cover letter.
Please follow standard practice when submitting a series with a cover
letter and use:

[PATCH 0/1] for the cover letter
[PATCH 1/1] for the patch (or 1/2, 2/2, etc. for however many patches
are in the series)

> Thank you very much,
> Chia Chuan
> -------------------------------
> Test log:
> 1.)Run core-image-sato.hddimg on target platform(River Forest - Long Brook ).
> 2.)Builds core-image-sato(DPDKv1.8 and DPDKv2.0) on master and fido branch.
> 3.)insmod rte_kni.ko lo_mode=lo_mode_fifo , insmod igb_uio.ko
> 4.)Run dpdk test case (e.g.- version_autotest). 

I presume using the crystalforest BSP?

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center