[meta-intel] Why meta-intel never specify the Intel-SNA as a primary Xorg driver in common folder ?

[Burton, Ross]

On 16 April 2015 at 07:05, Ahmad, Mohd Azril <mohd.azril.ahmad at intel.com>
wrote:

> Actually my main concern here is why we need to boot up X11 MatchBox with
> multiple video’s module (intel, vesa & fbdev) while we can fix this to only
> load “intel” during the X startup ? I guess this looks more proper and
> clean way of using the pure “intel” driver right ? (please correct me if
> I’m wrong) ..
>

meta-intel doesn't set the X driver to be intel explicitly because there's
no reason to.  The overhead of loading fbdev and modesettings is
insignificant and not all machines supported by the meta-intel BSP use the
intel driver, some actually need the modesettings driver.

Ross
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-intel/attachments/20150416/815f0d85/attachment.html>