[meta-intel] [PATCH 1/2] create a new recipe for emgd-1.16

Kamble, Nitin A nitin.a.kamble at intel.com
Tue Jan 22 15:04:30 PST 2013



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hart, Darren
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 2:58 PM
> To: Kamble, Nitin A
> Cc: Zanussi, Tom; meta-intel at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] create a new recipe for emgd-1.16
> 
> On 01/22/2013 02:53 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Zanussi, Tom
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 2:41 PM
> >> To: Kamble, Nitin A
> >> Cc: Hart, Darren; meta-intel at yoctoproject.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] create a new recipe for emgd-1.16
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 14:06 -0800, nitin.a.kamble at intel.com wrote:
> >>> From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble at intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> The introduction of emgd-1.16 recipe has lead to this unification of
> >>> package names of emgd-1.14 & 1.16 recipes. Update the relevant BSP
> >>
> >> Sorry, I don't understand what it means that this has lead to the
> >> unification of package names.  Can you explain in more detail?
> >
> > Tom,
> >    The generated package names included versions, which are different for
> emgd-1.14 and emgd 1.16 recipes. These package names are changed now so
> that they won't be different versions for the emgd recipes. If you look at the
> code changes it will be obvious. I guess the license text overshadows the
> actual code in this commit.
> >
> >>
> >>> configs with the new emgd package names.
> >>
> >> It seems you have three separate things going on in this patch:
> >>
> >> - a new 1.16 recipe
> >> - updated to the old 1.14
> >> - some unexplained changes to the BSP machine files
> >>
> >> Can you break them up with explanations?
> >>
> >
> >  These are meant to be together, all these changes are caused by emgd-
> 1.16 recipe coexisting along with emgd-1.14 recipe. Earlier I kept these
> changes in separate commits, and then I realized that they would be better
> together. Without the emgd-1.16 recipe the rest of changes do not make
> sense by themselves.
> 
> Can they follow?
Ok, I will split them into multiple commits as developed originally.

Thanks,
Nitin


> 
> --
> Darren Hart
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
> Yocto Project - Linux Kernel


More information about the meta-intel mailing list