[meta-freescale] [Sumo] Freescale iMX6 vivante support with EGLFS Qt5

[Joe Rutledge]

TBH, I hadn't realised it was the close source kernel, it was just 
whatever I was using before. I had assumed that linux-fslc-imx was the 
closed source and linux-imx was the open source! I have an iMX6 and the 
following are recipes are within meta-freescale, which should I be using?


linux-fslc

linux-fslc-4.9

linux-fslc-imx

linux-fslc-imx-rt

linux-imx-4.9.88


Best regards,

Joe


On 31/08/18 02:12, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 8:13 AM Joe Rutledge <joe.rutledge at phabrix.com> wrote:
>> I have a question about Vivante support within the linux-imx kernel from
>> meta-freescale and how to correctly use it within my image. I have
>> recently started moving my existing working image from Krogoth to Sumo.
>> I'm having great trouble getting it to build now though, I seem to have
>> constant circular dependencies between PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/egl
>> and its many friends.
>>
>> What packages do I need in my image recipe to get back the Vivante
>> support for an EGLFS Qt platform, based on the linux-imx kernel? Do I
>> need to tweak a specific set of PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/*gl*
>> variables to get that package list to work correctly?
>>
>> Many, many thanks in advance to anyone that can help, this is driving me
>> nuts!
> I did not use any customer in Sumo using Qt *with* closed source BSP.
> We have people running Qt under mainline BSP with success. Do you need
> the closed source BSP?
>