[meta-freescale] Updates to meta-fsl-arm (master) in 2016-01-11
zhenhua.luo at nxp.com
Mon Jan 11 18:36:38 PST 2016
Before meta-fsl-arm and meta-fsl-ppc are formally replaced by meta-freescale in yoctoproject.org, we should ensure the QorIQ bits are available in meta-fsl-arm and meta-fsl-ppc.
The duplicated effort is done for both i.MX and QorIQ products currently, to avoid such duplicated effort, we'd better make meta-freescale replace fsl-arm and fsl-ppc ASAP. What's your thought?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 2:33 AM
> To: Ting Liu <ting.liu at nxp.com>
> Cc: meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org; Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo at nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Updates to meta-fsl-arm (master) in 2016-01-11
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Ting Liu <ting.liu at nxp.com> wrote:
> > I sent some patches to meta-fsl-arm on 2015-12-15 and noticed that they are
> marked as 'rejected' just now.
> > No comment for 'rejected'?
> I noticed they were the same sent for meta-freescale and as meta-fsl-arm is
> not being use for QorIQ releases do you think it is worth keeping it receiving
> If it is really desired I can go over them but as meta-freescale is in use for QorIQ
> it seems like pushing them there makes more sense and avoid duplication.
> I didn't yet did a major review of them, as I am on holidays, but will do as time
> Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
More information about the meta-freescale