[meta-freescale] Is there any point in keeping linux-imx.inc?

[Richard Röjfors]

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Ernst Sjöstrand <ernstp at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I'm trying to figure out the IMX/FSCL kernel branches and realized that
> linux-fscl-imx and linux-imx is the same thing.

I don't realise the same thing.

My view is:
-fslc- gets more stuff merged from upstreams and additional fixes brought in.

linux-imx is FSL/NXP's slowly progressing tree. Why are they not
trying to go mainline instead?

--Richard