[meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 00/50] QorIQ patches

[Ting Liu]

Hello Otavio,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br]
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 10:47 PM
> To: Ting Liu <ting.liu at nxp.com>
> Cc: Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo at nxp.com>; meta-
> freescale at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 00/50] QorIQ
> patches
> 
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Ting Liu <ting.liu at nxp.com> wrote:
> > Hello Otavio,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br]
> >> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 9:53 PM
> >> To: Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo at nxp.com>
> >> Cc: Ting Liu <ting.liu at nxp.com>; meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 00/50]
> >> QorIQ patches
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo at nxp.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Can you please review and merge the remaining patches of QorIQ SDK
> 2.0?
> >> Currently the kernel build is blocked for QorIQ targets. Attached is
> >> the latest CI report.
> >>
> >> I merged a number of changes since you made the branch and to be
> >> honest I assumed they were the same stuff; please rebase the tree and
> >> let me know when it is ready for review again please.
> > [Liu Ting-B28495] I did not see new commits on github meta-freescale layer
> since Jul 22.
> > The tree I sent on July 23 was already based on the latest.
> 
> I sent the patches I think are fine to master-next; 
[Liu Ting-B28495] the patches were applied on master-next for a week. When will they be merged to master branch?
Meanwhile, I see some patches were pushed to master branch directly. Now master and master-next branch have diverged. If I want to send some subsequent patches which depend on the ones that are only available on master-next, should master-next be based on?