[meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 00/50] QorIQ patches

[Zhenhua Luo]

Hello Otavio, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br]
> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 9:11 PM
> To: Ting Liu <ting.liu at nxp.com>
> Cc: Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo at nxp.com>; meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 00/50] QorIQ
> patches
> 
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Ting Liu <ting.liu at nxp.com> wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br]
> >> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 10:47 PM
> >> To: Ting Liu <ting.liu at nxp.com>
> >> Cc: Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo at nxp.com>; meta-
> >> freescale at yoctoproject.org
> >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 00/50]
> >> QorIQ patches
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Ting Liu <ting.liu at nxp.com> wrote:
> >> > Hello Otavio,
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br]
> >> >> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 9:53 PM
> >> >> To: Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo at nxp.com>
> >> >> Cc: Ting Liu <ting.liu at nxp.com>; meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> >> >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 00/50]
> >> >> QorIQ patches
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo at nxp.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Can you please review and merge the remaining patches of QorIQ
> >> >> > SDK
> >> 2.0?
> >> >> Currently the kernel build is blocked for QorIQ targets. Attached
> >> >> is the latest CI report.
> >> >>
> >> >> I merged a number of changes since you made the branch and to be
> >> >> honest I assumed they were the same stuff; please rebase the tree
> >> >> and let me know when it is ready for review again please.
> >> > [Liu Ting-B28495] I did not see new commits on github
> >> > meta-freescale layer
> >> since Jul 22.
> >> > The tree I sent on July 23 was already based on the latest.
> >>
> >> I sent the patches I think are fine to master-next; the device tree
> >> path changes seems unclear for me. Why it is need?
> >
> > [Liu Ting-B28495] a sub-folder fsl/ under arch/powerpc/boot/dts/ was
> created to hold all the device tree files in kernel source:
> > http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/ppc/sdk/linux.git/tree/arch/powe
> > rpc/boot/dts/fsl?h=sdk-v2.0.x
> 
> The path for the dtb is not the usual way of using it; it would be better if the
> Makefile was fixed so normal usage works. 
[Luo Zhenhua] The dts path change for QorIQ PPC targets is upstreamed to the mainline of community kernel  source tree. The new path will be the normal path for future SDKs. 
	https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl


Best Regards,

Zhenhua