[meta-freescale] i.MX6 AMP

Edward Wingate edwingate8 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 8 13:16:29 PDT 2015


On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Otavio Salvador
<otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>> 1) Does this from ~20 months ago still hold true that meta-fsl-arm kernels cannot be
>> configured via fragments? https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2014-February/007037.html
>
> Yes, it does.

Is it in how the kernel recipes are written that fragments aren't
supported?  Or does it go deeper than that?

> 4.x works on Wandboard however it won't offer support for some parts
> of the SoC, at this moment (GPU acceleration, some degree of IPU and
> VPU, ...).

So if I understand kernel development correctly, the extra Wandboard
support is due to contributions to linux-wandboard kernel that didn't
get upstreamed?  Is there a way to find these contributions besides
reading commit logs/doing diffs?

Thanks for the clarifications.  I've been using Yocto for almost a
year now, but it's such a beast, I probably only really understand <1%
of it.  The rest I just say a prayer that nothing goes wrong before
each build.  =)


More information about the meta-freescale mailing list