[meta-freescale] Different use of libOpenVG in meta-fsl-arm and official meta-fsl-bsp-release

[Sundararaj Prabhu]

It is customer preference to choose libOpenVG.3d or libOpenVG.2d and it is build time decision. Not sure whether the current recipe provide the build options to choose libOpenVG.3d or libOpenVG.2d for DQ. But this is easily fixable.

But it is hard to use the same rootfs when need for OpenVG.3D on DL/solo and OpenVG.2D for i.MX6DQ. 
We know the expectation is runtime identification or export variable switch, but currently not supported.

-----Original Message-----
From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br] 
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 9:24 AM
To: Viguera, Javier <Javier.Viguera at digi.com>; Post Lauren-RAA013 <Lauren.Post at freescale.com>; Hochstein Tom-R60874 <Tom.Hochstein at freescale.com>
Cc: meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org; Sundararaj Prabhu-B36876 <Prabhu.Sundararaj at freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Different use of libOpenVG in meta-fsl-arm and official meta-fsl-bsp-release

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Viguera, Javier <Javier.Viguera at digi.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br]
>>
>>
>> This highlights a serious problem. Freescale says the QDL are 
>> software compatible however this symlink mangle breaks this 
>> assumption. Mainly it is not possible to use same rootfs, in read-only, for them all.
>>
>> I added few Freescale people on Cc so they can comment on it.
>
> Did you get any feedback on this?
>
> Anyone?

I am still waiting; I discussed this with Lauren and she said she were going to check this internally. I added her on Cc so she can comment on this.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750