[meta-freescale] Yocto 1.6 + QT5.3.2 on i.MX6

[Daiane Angolini]

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Dale Tyler <freescale11 at tylerent.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I did not communicate well. We have our own image recipe that includes
> core-image-base.bb. It is similar to core-image-minimal in that it does not
> include X11 or Wayland nor many other packages that are in the larger
> images.

If you are including or inheriting core-image-base, so it should be
OK. The problem when basing your work on core-image-minimal is that it
does not include MACHINE_RECOMMENDS, which include the firmwares.

>
> We are using dizzy primarily because the fido changes for our platform were
> only released a few days ago and we want to complete our initial work before
> moving to fido or QT5.4.2.
>
> However, if it can be determined that this problem can only be fixed by
> going to fido and/or QT5.4.2, then we will do so. SInce there supposedly was
> a fix for this in daisy, perhaps it simply got dropped for dizzy somehow.
>
> Has anyone built an image similar to what we are using and fixed this issue?

I know there are someone in the mailing list with success on using
QT5.x, I cannot remember who or which branch.
However I have never saw this:
PACKAGECONFIG_append_pn-qtquickcontrols = " accessibility"
PACKAGECONFIG_append_pn-qtbase = " accessibility"


You don't exactly need to have your BSP ported to fido in order to
test the build of any imx6Q machine with fido and QT. Take, for
example, imx6qsabresd and see if you can build the image.

Daiane

>
> Thanks,
> Dale Tyler
>
>
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:10:25 -0300, Daiane Angolini wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Dale Tyler <freescale11 at tylerent.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We are having problems building a customized core-image-minimal image
>>> with
>>> QT5.3.2.
>>
>>I suggest you to create your own image. And, instead of base it off
>>core-image-minimal, use core-image-base.
>>
>>>
>>> The error we see when creating the target rootfs is
>>> ERROR: qtquickcontrols not found in the base feeds (cgtqmx6
>>> cortexa9hf-vfp-neon-mx6qdl cortexa9hf-vfp-neon cortexa9hf-vfp
>>> armv7ahf-vfp-neon armv7ahf-vfp armv6hf-vfp armv5ehf-vfp armv5hf-vfp
>>> noarch
>>> any all).
>>>
>>> We cloned the GIT repo using:
>>> git clone -b dizzy https://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5.git
>>>
>>> We have included the following in local.conf:
>>> PACKAGECONFIG_append_pn-qtquickcontrols = " accessibility"
>>> PACKAGECONFIG_append_pn-qtbase = " accessibility"
>>>
>>> On May 28, 2014, there was a post to this list that talked about a fix
>>> being
>>> pushed by Octavio to master and daisy, which I would assume would have
>>> end
>>> up in the dizzy branch.
>>>
>>> If we leave out qtquick1 and qtquickcontrols from IMAGE_INSTALL in our
>>> image
>>> recipe, things build fine, but we need qtquickcontrols for our
>>> application.
>>>
>>> Any suggestions on how to proceed would be welcome.
>>
>>Any special reason to stick to dizzy?
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dale
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> meta-freescale mailing list
>>> meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
>>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale