[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-demos][PATCH] New packagegroups to organize tools

[Otavio Salvador]

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov <picmaster at mail.bg> wrote:
> Hi Ann,
>
> On 07/11/2015 12:33 AM, Ann Thornton wrote:
>>
>> On 7/10/2015 2:21 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Ann,
>>>
>>> On 07/10/2015 09:32 PM, Ann Thornton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The tools are grouped into core and extended with i.MX specific
>>>> tools in a .bbappend file.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ann Thornton <ra43240 at freescale.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   .../packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-core.bb   |   39
>>>> +++++++++++++++++
>>>>   .../packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bb             |   45
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   .../packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bbappend       |   13 ++++++
>>>>   3 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
>>>>   create mode 100644
>>>> recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-core.bb
>>>>   create mode 100644
>>>> recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bb
>>>>   create mode 100644
>>>> recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bbappend
>>>
>>>
>>> Just curious regarding the naming of packagegroup-fsl-tools-core: what
>>> makes it FSL-specific?
>>
>>
>> Nothing, really.  Except that this is fsl-demos.  Should it be named
>> without the fsl?
>
>
> I think it would be better this way. I also looked at the extended
> packagegroup, and it can also go without the fsl.
>
> I'm leaving the final choice to your discretion.

More than that, is this a good name?

tools ... tools for what? profiling? debugging? installation? for what?

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750