[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-demos][PATCH] New packagegroups to organize tools

[Nikolay Dimitrov]

Hi Ann,

On 07/11/2015 12:33 AM, Ann Thornton wrote:
> On 7/10/2015 2:21 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote:
>> Hi Ann,
>>
>> On 07/10/2015 09:32 PM, Ann Thornton wrote:
>>> The tools are grouped into core and extended with i.MX specific
>>> tools in a .bbappend file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ann Thornton <ra43240 at freescale.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-core.bb   |   39
>>> +++++++++++++++++
>>>   .../packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bb             |   45
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   .../packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bbappend       |   13 ++++++
>>>   3 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644
>>> recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-core.bb
>>>   create mode 100644
>>> recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bb
>>>   create mode 100644
>>> recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bbappend
>>
>> Just curious regarding the naming of packagegroup-fsl-tools-core: what
>> makes it FSL-specific?
>
> Nothing, really.  Except that this is fsl-demos.  Should it be named
> without the fsl?

I think it would be better this way. I also looked at the extended
packagegroup, and it can also go without the fsl.

I'm leaving the final choice to your discretion.

>
> Thanks for the comments!
> Ann

Regards,
Nikolay