[meta-freescale] Packagegroup unexpectedly builds recipe

[Jonas Rydow]

OK, that makes sense. It does however mean that to be sure that to not get
clashes
between packages providing the same file, one would need to have only one
packagegroup
per recipe.

There are a lot of recipes that define several packagegroups in the same
recipe. I think
that is why I thought that they were built independently form one-another.

Thanks for the clarification.
Jonas


On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br>
wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Jonas Rydow <jrydow at gmail.com> wrote:
> > thanks very much for the answer, Gary.
>
> The reason why this is done is because when building a recipe it must
> be 'installable' and for it ALL runtime dependencies also need to be
> available.
>
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/attachments/20141010/4e36c0c1/attachment.html>