[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH v4] packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0: Add new package groups for GStreamer 1.0
Carlos Rafael Giani
dv at pseudoterminal.org
Wed Jul 2 11:35:39 PDT 2014
On 2014-07-02 18:31, Daiane Angolini wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Carlos Rafael Giani
> <dv at pseudoterminal.org> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Carlos Rafael Giani <dv at pseudoterminal.org>
>> ---
>> .../packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0-commercial.bb | 20 ++++
>> .../packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0-full.bb | 19 ++++
>> .../packagegroups/packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0.bb | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 157 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 recipes-multimedia/packagegroups/packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0-commercial.bb
>> create mode 100644 recipes-multimedia/packagegroups/packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0-full.bb
>> create mode 100644 recipes-multimedia/packagegroups/packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0.bb
> Carlos, you can hate me forever, because it´s v4 and it´s the first
> time I send you this feedback. But I took sometime to realize that.
> (and I´m so sorry)
>
> Would you pleeeeeeeeease, change the name of your packagegroups?
>
> instead of using
>
> packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0*
>
> Can you, please use
>
> packagegroup-fslc-gstreamer1.0?
>
> My goal is to make clear the recipe points to a community effort
> package, not a package from Freescale.
>
> I based my decision on kernel and u-boot recipes. We have both
> u-boot-imx and u-boot-fslc, so I think it makes sense to follow this
> standard.
>
> Other than that, I´m ok with the patch
>
> Thanks a lot in advance,
> Daiane
Hey Daiane,
renaming is no problem. I'll send a v5 until tomorrow.
Carlos
More information about the meta-freescale
mailing list