[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH v4] packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0: Add new package groups for GStreamer 1.0

[Daiane Angolini]

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Carlos Rafael Giani
<dv at pseudoterminal.org> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Rafael Giani <dv at pseudoterminal.org>
> ---
>  .../packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0-commercial.bb    |  20 ++++
>  .../packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0-full.bb          |  19 ++++
>  .../packagegroups/packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0.bb | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 157 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 recipes-multimedia/packagegroups/packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0-commercial.bb
>  create mode 100644 recipes-multimedia/packagegroups/packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0-full.bb
>  create mode 100644 recipes-multimedia/packagegroups/packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0.bb

Carlos, you can hate me forever, because it´s v4 and it´s the first
time I send you this feedback. But I took sometime to realize that.
(and I´m so sorry)

Would you pleeeeeeeeease, change the name of your packagegroups?

instead of using

packagegroup-imx-gstreamer1.0*

Can you, please use

packagegroup-fslc-gstreamer1.0?

My goal is to make clear the recipe points to a community effort
package, not a package from Freescale.

I based my decision on kernel and u-boot recipes. We have both
u-boot-imx and u-boot-fslc, so I think it makes sense to follow this
standard.

Other than that, I´m ok with the patch

Thanks a lot in advance,
Daiane