[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 0/4] Add support for Phytec Vybrid boards

[Tony Felice]

Hi Daiane,

Thanks for reviewing these commits!

For the first patch, I will resubmit this with a copyright line for the
u-boot-timesys recipe. I am not aware of a plan to move to mainline
u-boot on the Phytec Vybrid machines.

For the second patch, I think this actually might not be necessary - I
had originally planned to have a machine specific SRCREV and SRCBRANCH
for each Vybrid board, but I think I can actually leave the generic
SRCREV and SRCBRANCH for the twr-vf65gs10 to use (and for a default use
case), and a machine specific SRCREV and SRCBRANCH for the Phytec
boards. I will do some testing and resubmit the patches.

Thanks,

Tony

On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 14:47 -0500, Daiane.Angolini at freescale.com wrote: 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: meta-freescale-bounces at yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale-
> > bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Felice
> > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 3:48 PM
> > To: meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> > Subject: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 0/4] Add support for Phytec
> > Vybrid boards
> > 
> > This series adds support for the Phytec Cosmic Vybrid (pcl052) and Phytec
> > phyCORE Vybrid (pcm052) machines.
> > 
> > The first patch adds a modified u-boot 2011.12 with board support enabled
> > for these two machines, as the pcl052 and pcm052 are not supported in
> > mainline u-boot.
> > 
> > The second patch reworks the linux-timesys recipe to use the twr-vf65gs10
> > machine name for sources. This is in preparation for the Phytec board
> > support addition, as the Phytec machine names will also be used for
> > sources.
> > 
> > The third patch adds the machine definition for the pcl052 board.
> > 
> > The fourth patch adds the machine definition for the pcm052 board.
> > 
> 
> 
> Very nice, Anthony!
> 
> Thanks a lot for sending those new board support files ;-)
> 
> I have reviewed and nothing special. Only double check the copyright and the COMPATIBLE_MACHINE,
> but if you think the patches are OK, I´m fine 
> 
> (i´m sorry I have reviewed the patches in the wrong order... when I realized it was too late)
> 
> Daiane 
> 

-- 
Tony Felice
Vybrid Technical Lead
Timesys Corporation