[meta-freescale] i.MX 3.10.31-1.1.0_beta release - community feedback requested

xxiao8 xxiao8 at fosiao.com
Wed Aug 20 16:11:55 PDT 2014


Just switched from digest mode to single email mode and waiting for 
whoever does the next vote, then I will have the thread to vote on...

xxiao

On 08/20/2014 02:41 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:12 PM, xxiao8 <xxiao8 at fosiao.com> wrote:
>> I would have hoped Freescale stuck with 3.10.17 instead of 3.10.31 to make
>> 3.10.17 solid in the first place, unless 3.10.31 brought in something that
>> is a must-to-have I don't see the reason to make things unnecessarily
>> complicated. Customer can always patch to whatever 3.10.x when they want to
>> as those incremental patches are normally independent of Freescale's code
>> changes. Not to mention nowadays it's 3.10.53 now.
>>
>> Backport 3.10.31-beta to 3.10.17 and make this a gold release kernel is the
>> best option in my opinion. I again don't see the point to diverge at all.
> Please, if you want your vote to be considered do it in the another
> thread and inform your full name (as your name is not in from).
>



More information about the meta-freescale mailing list