[meta-freescale] i.MX 3.10.31-1.1.0_beta release - community feedback requested

Otavio Salvador otavio at ossystems.com.br
Wed Aug 20 12:41:07 PDT 2014


On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:12 PM, xxiao8 <xxiao8 at fosiao.com> wrote:
> I would have hoped Freescale stuck with 3.10.17 instead of 3.10.31 to make
> 3.10.17 solid in the first place, unless 3.10.31 brought in something that
> is a must-to-have I don't see the reason to make things unnecessarily
> complicated. Customer can always patch to whatever 3.10.x when they want to
> as those incremental patches are normally independent of Freescale's code
> changes. Not to mention nowadays it's 3.10.53 now.
>
> Backport 3.10.31-beta to 3.10.17 and make this a gold release kernel is the
> best option in my opinion. I again don't see the point to diverge at all.

Please, if you want your vote to be considered do it in the another
thread and inform your full name (as your name is not in from).

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750


More information about the meta-freescale mailing list