[meta-freescale] yocto SDK for imx6 sabrelite board. (armel vs armhf)

[ss infod]

Does anyone have any input on this ?

Thanks
ssinfod


On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:02 AM, ssinfod ssinfod <ssinfod at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I just built an image with SDK for the imx6 sabrelite.  (ie: MACHINE ??=
> 'imx6qsabrelite')
> Command: bitbake core-image-full-cmdline -c populate_sdk
>
> I noticed that the SDK toolchain is based on "gnueabi" instead of
> "gnueabihf".
>
> Here is the list from the opt directory:
> dev at dev-i3:/opt/poky/1.6+snapshot$ ls
> environment-setup-cortexa9hf-vfp-neon-poky-linux-gnueabi
> site-config-cortexa9hf-vfp-neon-poky-linux-gnueabi
> sysroots
> version-cortexa9hf-vfp-neon-poky-linux-gnueabi
> dev at dev-i3:/opt/poky/1.6+snapshot$
> version-cortexa9hf-vfp-neon-poky-linux-gnueabi
>
> I thought that the imx6 was a armhf device.
> Why is the default toolchain using "gnueabi" and not "gnueabihf" for the
> sabrelite target ?
>
> Is there a way to change the SDK to use gnueabihf ?
>
> In fact, I find it scary that the default toolchain is not armhf. What is
> the reason behind that ?
> Is it because of the video (GPU/VPU) driver ?
>
> Thanks,
> ssinfod
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/attachments/20140813/76fd2ef2/attachment-0001.html>