[meta-freescale] IMAGE_BOOTLOADER vs. PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader

[Daiane Angolini]

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Mario Domenech Goulart
<mario at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm making a script to extract data out of bitbake's cache metadata and
> stumbled upon IMAGE_BOOTLOADER.
>
> Is there any special reason to use IMAGE_BOOTLOADER instead of
> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader?
>

It is used in image_types_fsl.bbclass [1] during the sdcard creation.

I´m not sure if it would be, currently, absolutely needed.... but it
seems to be working.


[1] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-fsl-arm/tree/classes/image_types_fsl.bbclass#n185



Thanks for asking,
Daiane

> Best wishes.
> Mario
> --
> http://www.ossystems.com.br
> --
> _______________________________________________
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale