[meta-freescale] GPU 2d/3d acceleration not working in yocto qte-in-use-image

Otavio Salvador otavio at ossystems.com.br
Wed Jul 17 14:02:27 PDT 2013


On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Daiane Angolini
<daiane.angolini at freescale.com> wrote:
> On 07/17/2013 10:14 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Le Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:37:09 -0300,
>>> Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Le Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:30:18 -0300,
>>>>> Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Those in master-next will be send to mailing list for review.
>>>>>>
>>>>> so if I understand well master-next is a sandbox which can get commits
>>>>> not sent to the ML ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No; master-next is a place I have been using to push things to
>>>> autobuilder or people test. It sometimes has patches not sent to
>>>> mailing list for my convenience so I can get autobuilder test and
>>>> feedback.
>>>
>>>
>>> so you confirm that master-next can get commits not sent to the ML so
>>> the answer to the question is "yes" ;-) that's not a big issue for
>>> master-next the only thing is to be aware of that.
>>>
>>> Just FYI, unless I'm mistaken, these ones are in master and were not
>>> sent to the ML :
>>>
>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-fsl-arm/commit/?id=30f65ca2688a4c94f9790968fa2a8408e8e50a34
>>>
>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-fsl-arm/commit/?id=5398e59900cfceb995f924bd06dc8e3801599767
>>>
>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-fsl-arm/commit/?id=4a91984318cbc8c8b56f319a6eb7856e81fa9cac
>>>
>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-fsl-arm/commit/?id=daf582c93a7283fb0af3b25fe2ada48f4c9985c4
>>>
>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-fsl-arm/commit/?id=ba487405f60c38ea2a77b7a6866f954b665eefa7
>>>
>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-fsl-arm/commit/?id=d48e4022824a13206f2a893759cf332a174e6d7d
>>>
>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-fsl-arm/commit/?id=f8a8a5eddc9e0d7e39e219dfb1fd137c8f77addc
>>>
>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-fsl-arm/commit/?id=1cb885570c9666bf4c7f8986623fc66988cec292
>>>
>>> Here again not a big problem : the only thing is to be aware patches can
>>> reach master without being sent to the ML, that can be important for
>>> peoples having external layers based on meta-fsl-arm's master branch.
>>
>>
>> Yes and if you check those they're build failure fixes (except the
>> duplicated assignment in mx28evk) so I could keep autobuilder and
>> users being able to build. So this is the exception :-)
>
> I don't agree it should exists any exception for this.

For everything there're an exception. However those patches were
failures which NO ONE fixed and I use daily build for checking the
quality of the BSP so it being broken is a problem for me.

It is clear that *most* people do not run updated master branches (or
they'd have got those failures and send a patch).

> I really think any merged patch MUST be sent to ML previously.

Most are send. Except the exceptions as said above.

> I've been "accepting" your master-next approach only because I don't think
> it matter for anyone. However, we must be sure what have in master.

There's GIT for it. If people matter GIT log have all the information
and I try to keep informative logs.

> Is there any restriction from Yoctoproject daily build server that it must
> build every single time, with no failure?

No; this is my restriction. The more time it is failing to build more
failure accumulate and I keep it working all the time to avoid having
hidden issues there.

Regards,

--
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750



More information about the meta-freescale mailing list