[yocto] [opkg-devel] [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier
richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Fri Oct 11 09:45:25 PDT 2019
On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 15:54 +0000, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote:
> On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528
> > <
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!8RtsWJXbDz_l063ZSVKrRMwvQ5KGdD0lk9aSjlUW9VHM2wufITJnBuIvovQxoT0yJXu-6Q$
> > >
> >
> > I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg-
> > utils
> > dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX
> > Identifier to add.
>
> thanks for doing this!
>
> > The doubt concerns those script :
> > makePackage
> > opkg-build
> > opkg-buildpackage
> > opkg-compare-indexes
> > opkg-diff
> > opkg-extract-file
> > opkg-graph-deps
> > opkg-list-fields
> > opkg-make-index
> > opkg-show-deps
> > opkg-unbuild
> > opkg-update-index
> >
> > What license do you want them to carry ?
>
> Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris
> Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the
> thread).
>
> My take on it: since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that
> have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license
> the rest as GPLv2+ too.
I didn't author these, they were imported from ipkg-utils which was
part of handhelds.org. I did modify things quite a bit during the
import.
handhelds.org's CVS repos aren't there any more but I do have old
sources lying around locally. I have a snapshot of the CVS repo from
20050930 and it has GPLv2 COPYING file (not 2+, just 2).
I'd suggest we follow the original licensing of that and go with GPLv2.
Cheers,
Richard
More information about the yocto
mailing list