[yocto] Yocto layers missing thud branches

[richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org]

On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 16:21 -0700, akuster808 wrote:
> 
> On 11/20/18 4:05 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 09:47 +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > On Monday, 19 November 2018 12:11:35 AM NZDT Max Krummenacher wrote:
> > > > Am Samstag, den 17.11.2018, 15:50 -0800 schrieb akuster808:
> > > > > Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and
> > > > > meta-cgl
> > > > > please add a "Thud" branch
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are
> > > > not
> > > > yet applied:
> > > > 
> > 
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html
> > > I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW.
> > 
> > Given we don't test those any more, should we be pushing these new
> > branches?
> 
> Are the branching schemes in sync with what we test , build or both? 
> I think we should be clear what is built or built and tested if there
> are exception.
> 
> 
> The 2.6 release notes called out so it may lead to the conclusion its
> tested.
> 
> Release Name: meta-qt3-thud-20.0.0
> Branch: thud
> Tag: thud-20.0.0
> Hash: 02f273cba6c25f5cf20cb66d8a417a83772c3179
> md5: 7b73bf1132428ea898938b03815cad21

Scripts may have put that in the release notes and even done tagging
but I'm fairly sure it doesn't get built or tested...

I think processes are being followed without review. Yes, I probably
should have caught this before now but I'm not alone in that :(.

Cheers,

Richard