[yocto] QA cycle report for 2.2.2 rc2

[Cruz, Libertad]

Ok, I will open a bug for QA to fix this ptest comparison issue, Bug 12094.  I guess this ptest bug 12081 cannot be a blocker for the release. 

Best Regards
Libertad G. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bystricky, Juro 
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 3:14 PM
To: akuster808 <akuster808 at gmail.com>; Cruz, Libertad <libertad.cruz at intel.com>; Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>; yocto at yoctoproject.org; Jolley, Stephen K <stephen.k.jolley at intel.com>; Zhang, Jessica <jessica.zhang at intel.com>
Cc: Cruz Alcaraz, Juan M <juan.m.cruz.alcaraz at intel.com>; Jordan, Robin L <robin.l.jordan at intel.com>
Subject: RE: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.2.2 rc2

I checked out 2.2_M3 2679a347c576f5411fbe802d2f6201c94036ecb2.
The recipes for gzip and slang do not contain any ptest code, so that explains why the tests are missing. 
However, flex recipe has a code for ptest. So there is a bit of mystery left.

________________________________________
From: akuster808 [akuster808 at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 1:06 PM
To: Bystricky, Juro; Cruz, Libertad; Richard Purdie; yocto at yoctoproject.org; Jolley, Stephen K; Zhang, Jessica
Cc: Cruz Alcaraz, Juan M; Jordan, Robin L
Subject: Re: [yocto] QA cycle report for 2.2.2 rc2

On 09/15/2017 01:01 PM, Bystricky, Juro wrote:
> The commit is for 2.4 M3 (5f6945f5031e1a4ca116cc1eccf4c2f9dc228547)
> 2.4 does contain the ptests for gzip, slang and flex. (Although there 
> are some other mysteries, like sed-ptest is missing) It would seem that 2.2 had never contained (or lost a while ago) those ptests.
Thanks for looking into this. Is there any action I need to follow up on?